Prophet Roja, known for his chilling and high-profile predictions, has once again found himself in the spotlight following the resurfacing of one of his prior prophecies. The controversial religious figure, who earned attention for predicting the fatal helicopter accident involving Dr. Edward Omane Boamah, had previously warned of a serious incident involving A Plus, the Member of Parliament for Gomoa Central.
In the earlier prophecy, Roja claimed that the MP could be involved in a severe accident near Kasoa, which might prove deadly unless prayers were made to prevent it. The statement, widely circulated online, has reignited debate over the ethics and impact of public prophecies that directly involve individuals.
A Plus, known for his outspoken nature on social media, did not stay silent. On Monday, August 11, he responded to the prophecy with a post on Facebook that both criticized and mocked the so-called dangerous predictions. The MP suggested that divine revelation had also shown a troubling future for Prophet Roja himself, hinting at a possible physical attack from unidentified individuals.
“God revealed to me last night that some boys will physically confront Prophet Roja very soon. Let’s pray for him,” A Plus stated, injecting sarcasm into his response and fueling the ongoing debate.
The exchange has ignited discussions across social media platforms, with commentators split on the issue. Some argue that issuing specific prophecies about named public figures can be reckless and irresponsible, potentially inciting fear or violence. Others see it as part of the entertainment and intrigue surrounding Ghana’s spiritual and prophetic landscape, where sensational predictions often go viral.
The latest controversy adds to a string of public interactions between religious figures and politicians in Ghana, highlighting the delicate balance between faith, free speech, and accountability in prophetic declarations. Many online users have called for restraint and caution, urging both prophets and public figures to consider the societal impact of their statements.