At the centre of the dispute is a preliminary objection filed by Kumi’s legal team, which is seeking to halt the process triggered by a request from authorities in the United States. The request aims to have him transferred to face allegations of conspiracy to commit wire fraud and conspiracy to commit money laundering.
Representing Abu Trica, lawyers led by Oliver Barker Vormawor have questioned the very basis of the extradition bid. Their argument hinges on the scope of the 1931 treaty governing extradition between Ghana and the United States, which they say does not cover the offences cited.
The defence contends that neither wire fraud nor money laundering appears on the treaty’s list of extraditable crimes. They also argue that the clauses dealing with conspiracy are narrowly defined and do not apply to the charges brought against their client.
The legal team insists that Ghana cannot invoke later domestic legislation to stretch the treaty beyond its original terms, maintaining that any extradition must strictly adhere to the agreement as it was first signed.
Outside the courtroom, the case has stirred public interest. A group of youth, reportedly from Swedru, gathered at the premises during proceedings, demanding Abu Trica’s release.
Source:
www.zionfelix.net
