The White House has said it will work more closely with US artificial intelligence (AI) firms to combat “industrial-scale campaigns” by foreign actors to steal advances in the technology.
Michael Kratsios, Director of Science and Technology Policy, wrote in an internal memo that the administration had new information indicating “foreign entities, principally based in China” were exploiting American firms.
Through a process called “distilling”, such firms are essentially copying AI technology developed by US companies, he said.
A representative of China’s US embassy in Washington DC said its development was “the result of its own dedication and effort as well as international cooperation”.
In the memo, Kratsios said the aim was to “systematically undermine American research and development and access proprietary information”.
In an attempt to avoid and halt “malicious exploitation,” he said the White House will be doing four things:
- sharing more information with US AI companies about “tactics employed and actors involved” in distillation campaigns
- working to “better coordinate” with companies to fight the attacks
- develop a set of “best practices to identify, mitigate, and remediate” them
- “explore” how the White House can hold foreign actors accountable for such distillation
The memo did not detail any specific plans for action against foreign entities found to be distilling US AI technology.
A White House spokesperson declined to comment beyond the memo.
A representative of China’s US embassy in Washington DC took issue with “the unjustified suppression of Chinese companies by the US” in response to the memo
“China is not only the world’s factory but is also becoming the world’s innovation lab,” the representative added.
“China’s development is the result of its own dedication and effort as well as international cooperation that delivers mutual benefits.”
Distillation campaigns are carried out by firms that usually operate many thousands of individual accounts for a given AI chatbot or tool, allowing them to appear as normal users.
Those accounts then undertake more coordinated attempts to “jailbreak” or otherwise expose information about AI models that is not supposed to be made public, which is saved and applied to their own AI model building and training.
“As methods to detect and mitigate industrial-scale distillation grow more sophisticated, foreign entities who build their AI capabilities on such fragile foundations should have little confidence in the integrity and reliability of the models they produce,” Kratsios said.
While Kratsios did not name any foreign entities, leading AI companies like OpenAI and Anthropic have said they are dealing with such distillation activity.
Earlier this year, Anthropic described distillation “attacks” by three AI laboratories, DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax, saying it had found them all to be working to copy Anthropic models through distillation campaigns. All three of the labs are based in China.
OpenAI has also accused DeepSeek of copying its technology.
DeepSeek, Moonshot, and MiniMax did not immediately respond to BBC requests for comment.
The firm said at the time that the model cost only a few million dollars to create, a fraction of the hundreds of billions of dollars being spent by other AI firms to build their models and tools.
Last month, the DeepSeek chatbot suffered a major outage. It is expected to soon release a new version of its AI model.
US President Donald Trump is expected to visit China in May.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Source: www.myjoyonline.com