AU, ECOWAS urged to act as Russian recruitment exploits vulnerable African youth

Fourteen young Ghanaian men thought they were heading to Russia for legitimate work opportunities. Instead, they ended up on the frontlines of a foreign war they knew nothing about. 

The job advertisements appear innocuous enough: construction work in Russia, factory positions with housing included, security roles offering respectable salaries. 

For young Ghanaians struggling in a difficult economy, these postings on social media and WhatsApp groups seem like lifelines.

The issue escalated in early January 2026 when Ukraine formally invited Ghana’s Foreign Minister, Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa, to Kyiv for direct talks over a Ghanaian national captured while fighting for Russian forces. 

Ukrainian Foreign Minister Andrii Sybiha announced on January 7 that Ghanaian diplomats would be granted access to the detainee, who Ukraine described as a “Russian mercenary” captured in a combat zone. 

The invitation followed Ghana’s official request for the citizens’ return and marks a significant moment of accountability—physical evidence that young Ghanaians have not merely been recruited into Russian facilities or support roles, but have ended up bearing arms on active battlefields. 

For the government in Ghana, which had previously approached such reports with caution, the detention of one of its citizens as a prisoner of war made the crisis undeniably real.

As the Russia-Ukraine war nears its fourth year, the recruitment of foreign fighters has intensified on both sides, but Russia’s approach has proven particularly predatory. 

Shortly after the invasion began, President Vladimir Putin announced a strategic push to recruit foreigners on March 11, 2022, setting in motion a machinery of deception that has ensnared young Africans across the continent. 

The recruitment extends far beyond combat roles. Through schemes like the Alabuga Start programme—which targets women aged 18 to 22, predominantly from Africa—recruits are funnelled into weapons factories operating under dangerous conditions. 

“They took her dreams and put her on a factory floor making weapons for a war she knows nothing about,” one Ghanaian family told the Ghana Broadcasting Corporation, describing their daughter’s fate. 

Whether promised construction jobs or factory work, the pattern remains consistent: economic vulnerability exploited, false promises made, and young lives redirected toward Russia’s war machine.

In Kenya, police raids in early 2025 intercepted 20 young men before they could be deployed, prompting the Foreign Ministry to secure an agreement requiring Russia to notify Kenyan authorities of any citizens fighting involuntarily. 

South African officials launched investigations after discovering that social media influencers were being recruited to promote non-existent Russian job opportunities to their followers. 

Meanwhile, research by the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organised Crime has documented Ghanaian and Nigerian workers in Russian drone manufacturing facilities—part of a war economy that blurs the line between civilian employment and military complicity. 

In one stark case, a Nigerian man captured in Ukraine’s Zaporizhzhia region told investigators he had been forced into military service following his arrest in Russia, his economic migration twisted into conscription.

What Happens When Deceived Soldiers Come Home

The recruitment machinery exploits a fundamental failure of governance across the continent, according to Dr Ishmael Norman, a security analyst and former military officer. 

“The same method that Al-Qaeda was using to recruit people for their various activities is the same method that the various governments are using to recruit Africans,” Norman explained in an interview with Myjoyonline. 

“And that is actually a sign of governmental failure in creating job opportunities for the youth.” 

Young Africans desperate for work often don’t ask questions when opportunity appears to knock, he noted—a vulnerability that recruiters understand and manipulate systematically. 

But Norman warned of a looming security crisis that extends beyond the immediate tragedy of deception. 

Those who survive and return home, he said, will carry “a very heightened sense of violence, self-defence, and autonomy,” compounded by post-traumatic stress disorder. 

“If they come back and they cannot find jobs, they will set up cells for criminal activity,” Norman cautioned, drawing on his own military experience. “At some point, we may not see the effect now, but if you hear somebody standing in the middle of the road shooting at people, go and trace the background of the person, and then you will see someone suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder who doesn’t know how to handle his anger.” 

Without proper reintegration programs, psychological counselling, and employment opportunities, the returnees could pose long-term threats to national security across Ghana, Nigeria, and South Africa.

AU, ECOWAS Urged to Confront Russia Over Youth Recruitment

African governments must move beyond caution to concrete action, an international law expert Dr. Innocent Badasu, argued. 

“At the moment, it’s important for African governments to raise their concerns with Russia. That in itself would elevate the conversation on the subject matter,” he said. 

But diplomatic engagement alone is insufficient. National security architectures must become more vigilant, he emphasised, actively monitoring recruitment hotspots and identifying the communities being targeted. 

“Begin to undertake some public education and awareness creation on the dangers of what lies ahead for those who have decided to take on the offers that are coming from Russia,” Badasu recommended. 

He also called on regional institutions to take a stand. 

“We would expect that the African Union Commission would be able to see this as a major security problem and at least issue some statement discouraging recruiters and the Russian state in a manner that would allow for constructive engagement,” he said. 

Yet Badasu acknowledged the limitations: collective action remains difficult “because of the historical context in which Russia is situated” and Moscow’s strategic positioning within multilateral forums as a champion of the global south. 

The challenge, he suggested, is finding ways to protect African youth without rupturing relationships that many governments still view as strategically valuable.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.