Close

Mineral royalty: Chamber of Mines rejects govt’s 12%, proposes 8% at the top end of the Sliding Scale regime

logo

logo



The Ghana Chamber of Mines has welcomed the government’s decision to implement a sliding scale royalty regime in Ghana’s mining sector, but called for further discussions on the specific percentages and other key elements of the regime.

Speaking to journalists at the Africa Extractives Media Fellowship, Michael Edem Akafia, President of the Chamber of Mines, said that while the Chamber supports the introduction of a sliding scale regime, it has reservations about the proposed percentages and the underlying premise for the new regime.

He stated that the Chamber holds a divergent view on the percentages, noting that a rise in global gold market prices does not automatically translate into profit for mining companies.

He said the Chamber is proposing a base rate of 4% and a top-end rate of 8%.

He explained that this proposal was developed following detailed research into other mining jurisdictions, and the Chamber believes its recommendation fairly reflects trends across the continent.

Trending:  Ghanaian Officials Shine at Africa Cup for Club Championship in Zimbabwe

“We are not against a sliding scale, but we believe the range should be between 4% and 8%. In the paper we presented to the Minister, we compared mature mining jurisdictions. In Africa, the only outlier is Mali, which recently introduced 10.5% at the higher end of its scale under a military regime—so we know they don’t listen to industry concerns.

“In virtually every jurisdiction you examine, especially for gold, no country reaches 12%. We therefore believe 4–8% is the most reasonable range. Another proposal we made was the dedication of one percent of profits to community development,” he said.

Trending:  Abandon the 24-hour economy rhetoric immediately; focus on growing businesses — Kwaku Kwarteng

Michael Edem Akafia also dispelled the widely held perception that a rise in gold prices automatically translates into profit for mining companies.

He explained that while higher prices do enhance revenue generation for mining firms, this does not necessarily translate into profit due to a number of factors.

He noted that during periods of increased revenue, companies often channel funds into other operations to improve efficiency.

He stated that the additional revenue is typically directed toward activities such as in-pit exploration, the purchase of new equipment, the adoption of advanced technology, and other initiatives to ensure the sustainability of the company.

He therefore called for nuanced, non-sentimental discussions around the royalty regime to ensure that companies can fulfill their regulatory obligations without operating at a loss.

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.

Trending:  Arsenal beat Palace on penalties for place in EFL Cup semis

DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.


Source: www.myjoyonline.com
scroll to top