The decision by the State Interests and Governance Authority (SIGA) to encourage business-to-business (B2B) transactions among specified entities within its portfolio represents a deliberate, strategic, and forward-looking approach to public asset management in Ghana.
Far from being an administrative preference, this policy is anchored in sound economic reasoning, portfolio optimization principles, and the statutory mandate of SIGA to maximize the value of state investments.
At its core, SIGA’s enabling framework—established under the SIGA Act, 2019 (Act 990)—positions the Authority as the central oversight body responsible for ensuring that State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) and other specified entities operate efficiently, profitably, and in a manner that enhances national value.
A critical pillar of this mandate is the expectation that these entities generate and remit dividends to the state. These dividend flows are not incidental; they constitute a major and sustainable source of funding for SIGA and, by extension, for the broader fiscal architecture of government. It follows, therefore, that any policy instrument capable of strengthening the profitability and resilience of these entities directly contributes to national development.
It is within this context that the B2B policy must be understood. By encouraging specified entities to transact with one another—where commercially viable and consistent with procurement and governance frameworks—SIGA is effectively promoting the retention and circulation of economic value within its own portfolio ecosystem. Instead of value leaking out of the public sector through external procurement and service arrangements, this policy ensures that revenues, profits, and opportunities are, as far as practicable, internalized within state-owned structures.
This approach reflects a sophisticated application of portfolio theory to public sector governance. In any well-managed investment portfolio, synergies between constituent entities are actively cultivated to enhance overall returns. The same logic applies here.
When one state entity procures goods or services from another—be it insurance, logistics, energy supply, financial services, or infrastructure support—the transaction does more than meet an operational need. It simultaneously strengthens the revenue base of the supplying entity, improves its financial performance, and increases its capacity to declare dividends. The cumulative effect is a virtuous cycle in which value is created, retained, and amplified across the portfolio.
Importantly, this policy does not undermine competition, distort markets, or override statutory procurement obligations. On the contrary, it operates firmly within the boundaries of existing legal and regulatory frameworks, including the Public Procurement Act and the Public Financial Management Act.
Heads of entities and their boards retain full fiduciary responsibility to ensure that all transactions are commercially justified, competitively priced, and compliant with due process. SIGA’s role is not to direct procurement decisions, but to provide strategic guidance that aligns individual entity actions with the broader objective of maximizing state value.
Beyond its financial implications, the B2B policy fosters a culture of collaboration, coordination, and mutual support among state entities. Historically, many SOEs have operated in silos, often duplicating efforts or overlooking opportunities for internal partnerships. This policy breaks down those barriers, encouraging entities to view one another not as isolated units, but as strategic partners within a shared national enterprise. The resulting synergies can lead to cost efficiencies, knowledge sharing, innovation, and improved service delivery.
For example, a state-owned insurance firm providing coverage for other public entities not only strengthens its premium base but also ensures that risk management remains within the national system. Similarly, a public utility supplying energy to another SOE reinforces domestic value chains while enhancing operational reliability. These are not merely transactional benefits; they are structural advantages that contribute to the long-term sustainability of the entire portfolio.
From a policy perspective, this initiative aligns seamlessly with broader national objectives, including economic sovereignty, domestic resource mobilization, and the development of resilient local industries. By leveraging the collective strength of state-owned assets, Ghana is better positioned to reduce dependency on external providers, retain capital within the economy, and build robust internal markets that support growth and stability.
Moreover, for investors and stakeholders, the B2B policy signals a disciplined and integrated approach to public investment management. It demonstrates that SIGA is not only focused on compliance and oversight but is actively pursuing strategies that enhance value creation. A portfolio that is internally cohesive, strategically aligned, and financially interdependent is inherently more attractive, more resilient to external shocks, and better able to deliver consistent returns.
Make no mistake, SIGA’s encouragement of inter-entity business transactions is a pragmatic and innovative policy that transforms the way public sector assets interact and perform. It recognizes that the true strength of a portfolio lies not only in the individual performance of its components but in the quality of the linkages between them. By fostering these linkages, SIGA is building a more integrated, efficient, and value-driven ecosystem—one that maximizes dividends, strengthens institutional capacity, and ultimately delivers greater and more sustainable benefits to the Ghanaian state. This is not merely a policy of convenience; it is a strategic imperative grounded in law, economics, and a clear vision of how public assets should work together to drive national prosperity.
In conclusion, SIGA’s Business-to-Business policy stands as a bold and intelligent expression of how a nation can deliberately harness the full potential of its public assets for collective gain. By promoting strategic collaboration among state entities, the policy not only strengthens individual institutions but also builds an integrated ecosystem that retains value, enhances profitability, and secures sustainable dividends for national development.
This is how we transform state ownership from a passive holding into an active engine of prosperity. It is therefore imperative that all stakeholders—policymakers, boards, management, civil society organization, the media and indeed the wider citizenry—rally behind this vision.
The assets under SIGA’s oversight are not abstract institutions; they are the shared inheritance of the Ghanaian people. Protecting, preserving, and strengthening them is a collective duty. In supporting this policy, we are not merely endorsing a governance approach—we are affirming our commitment to safeguard that which belongs to all of us, and to ensure that it delivers enduring value for generations to come.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
DISCLAIMER: The Views, Comments, Opinions, Contributions and Statements made by Readers and Contributors on this platform do not necessarily represent the views or policy of Multimedia Group Limited.
Source: www.myjoyonline.com