Rev. Dr Alfred Kweku Akumbie
Opinion
3 minutes read
Ghana is widely admired for its democratic stability and religious vitality.
Faith plays a central role in the lives of millions of citizens, and Christianity, particularly Pentecostal and Charismatic expressions, has shaped public discourse for decades.
Yet in recent election cycles, a troubling pattern has emerged: prophetic pronouncements predicting only doom, death of political leaders, national collapse, bloodshed, and ominous signs often timed around presidential primaries and general elections.
These declarations have generated public anxiety, confusion, and social tension.
Leading Ghanaian newspapers have consistently drawn attention to this phenomenon. In a Daily Graphic editorial dated February 5, 2024, the paper warned that fake prophecies and predictions of election outcomes by self-styled prophets pose a threat to Ghana’s democratic stability.
Similarly, another Daily Graphic editorial published on September 2, 2024, urged religious leaders to exercise restraint in making political prophecies, citing contradictory predictions in previous elections that left many citizens confused.
Private newspapers such as the Daily Guide and The Chronicle have also criticised what they described as “prophets of election doom” whose pronouncements intensify fear rather than promote national unity.
Biblically, prophecy is intended to edify, exhort, and bring hope.
The Apostle Paul teaches that prophecy should strengthen, encourage, and comfort the people (1 Corinthians 14:3).
While scripture contains warnings of judgement, such warnings are consistently linked to moral accountability, repentance, and the possibility of restoration. Prophecy that is detached from these redemptive purposes departs from its biblical foundation.
The politicisation of prophecy raises serious concerns for Ghana’s democratic culture.
Prophecies predicting electoral violence, assassinations, or national collapse can undermine public confidence in democratic institutions and deepen political polarisation.
Scholars note that when religious authority is used to legitimise fear and political suspicion, democratic stability may be compromised (Haynes, 2011).
Democracy flourishes in an atmosphere of trust, rational debate, and peaceful participation, not prophetic intimidation.
Another troubling dimension is the commercialisation of prophecy. Media reports and public commentary suggest that some prophetic figures attach ominous predictions to paid consultations, special offerings, or costly spiritual interventions meant to avert disaster.
Sociological studies of African Pentecostalism caution that when spiritual authority operates without accountability, it risks degenerating into religious entrepreneurship, where fear becomes a tool for financial gain (Asamoah-Gyadu, 2013).
Discerning authentic prophetic ministry is therefore essential.
Scripture instructs believers to “test the spirits” (1 John 4:1). Jesus warned that false prophets are known by their fruits (Matthew 7:15–20).
Genuine prophecy reflects God’s character, promotes peace rather than chaos, and operates within systems of accountability (1 Corinthians 14:29, 33). Prophecy that consistently produces fear, confusion, and division contradicts these biblical principles.
Addressing the problem of fear-based prophecy requires a collective response.
The Church must strengthen doctrinal teaching on prophecy and enforce accountability among its leaders.
The media should avoid sensationalism and contextualise prophetic claims responsibly.
The state must protect freedom of religion while enforcing laws against public panic, fraud and incitement.
Citizens, too, must cultivate critical thinking and resist fear-driven spirituality.
Prophecy remains a valuable and sacred gift within Christianity.
However, when divorced from biblical ethics, accountability, and national responsibility, it becomes a source of fear, division, and exploitation.
Ghana does not need the silencing of prophets; it needs the purification of prophecy.
A mature society must distinguish between prophecy that builds and prophecy that destabilises.
For the sake of national peace and democratic maturity, prophetic voices must serve truth, hope, and cohesion, not fear, chaos, and confusion.
Source:
www.graphic.com.gh
